![]() ![]() ![]() Ībout 10% of the codebase is written in C. An extensive collection of web platform tests are also written in these languages. Some of the user interface is implemented in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This includes the Blink and V8 engines, the implementation of HTTP and other protocols, the internal caching system, and other essential browser components. Some employees of these companies also have email addresses.Ĭ++ is the primary language, comprising about half of the codebase. The Chromium browser codebase is widely used, so others have made important contributions, most notably Microsoft, Igalia, Yandex, Intel, Samsung, LG, Opera, and Brave. However, in terms of governance, the Chromium projects are not independent entities Google retains firm control of them. Google refers to this project and the offshoot ChromiumOS as "the Chromium projects", and its employees use email addresses for this development work. ![]() Contributors Ĭhromium has been a Google project since its inception, and Google employees have done the bulk of the development work. The Chromium browser codebase contains about 35 million source lines of code. Unlike Chromium, Chrome is not open-source, so its binaries are licensed as freeware under the Google Chrome Terms of Service. While Chrome has the same user interface functionality as Chromium, it changes the color scheme to the Google-branded one. Tracking mechanisms for usage and crash reports.Licensed codecs for the popular H.264 video and AAC audio formats.API keys for some Google services, including browser sync.Features Ĭhromium lacks the following Chrome features: Differences from Google Chrome Ĭhromium provides the vast majority of source code for Google Chrome, so the name "Chromium" was chosen by Google because chromium metal is used in chrome plating. Thus many Linux distributions do this, as well as FreeBSD and OpenBSD. This licensing permits any party to build the codebase and share the resulting browser executable with the Chromium name and logo. Third party dependencies are subject to a variety of licenses, including MIT, LGPL, Ms-PL, and an MPL/ GPL/ LGPL tri-license. The Google-authored portion is shared under the 3-clause BSD license. Google does not provide an official stable version of the Chromium browser, but does provide official API keys for some features, such as speech to text and translation.Ĭhromium is a free and open-source software project. Moreover, significant portions of the code are used by several app frameworks. Microsoft Edge, Samsung Internet, Opera, and many other browsers are based on the Chromium code. ![]() This codebase provides the vast majority of code for the Google Chrome browser, which is proprietary software and has some additional features. Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS, BSDsĬhromium is a free and open-source web browser project, mainly developed and maintained by Google. com /chromium /srcĬ++ primarily, HTML, CSS, JavaScript for UI and test suite > understand this is not exactly related to the DRM matter but it does > A different but related matter is the build process itself. I can open another bug over this if needed. To avoid duplicate work, it would be useful if you ran this analysis on > indicate that which is very clearly free software and that which needs > fully vetted any particular results but it does help to at least > Of course, automated licenses analysis is never perfect and I have not Actually, less than a third of the total files > recently submitted upstream's Chromium. The tarball produced by `guix build -source ungoogled-chromium`. > * third_party/blink has some images under CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0 I don't mean that to be an exhaustive list of everything, > Even in the short time I was reviewing it I found a number of freedom > building seems to involve downloading Chromium, then runnning > Taking this and considering Guix's build process: The method of > * Google Toolbar is in there, with a non-free EULA Did you record the absolute paths to these files? I cannot find these images: grepping for CC-BY-NC-SA or 'CreativeĬommons' did not aid. > other packages have their freedom problems fixed in this way but this, > ungoogled-chromium over it, and then building. If not it still amounts to distributing non-free software to > compile should itself be 100% free software and FSDG compliant from the > clean-up program after downloading the source, even if that has been > should not be hidden/removed after the fact by asking the user to run a > just like build flags, should not be sufficient. the user when they want to, for example, do guix build -S chromium.Īs Leo says, `guix build -source` should never return nonfree softwareĪs a matter of policy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |